portkin.blogg.se

1. #Vmware fusion 10 system requirements for mac
2. #Vmware fusion 10 system requirements pro
3. #Vmware fusion 10 system requirements software
4. #Vmware fusion 10 system requirements Pc

Parallels Desktop for Mac, except for 2 of the 14 testsīoth products did well, except for IE where Parallels Desktop is 80-91% faster ĭependent on game 1, video and Windows environment.ġ 3D Games tested were Civilization IV: Colonization and Portal. In many cases, tests were performed after both Adam and Successful launches and were timed using a stopwatch. MacTech’s test included launch and CPU tests, File and Network IO, Footprint, Application Launch, Application Performance and 3D and HD Graphics.

Both Fusion and Parallels Desktop were optimized for virtual machine performance. The tests were performed on the White MacBook, MacBook Pro, iMac and MacPro.

In most of MacTech’s tests, Parallels Desktop performed 14-20% faster than Fusion however, Fusion ran 10% faster than Parallels Desktop when running Windows XP 32-bit on 2 virtual processors.

#Vmware fusion 10 system requirements for mac

In March, 2009, Volume 25, Issue 04, MacTech published the results of a new series of benchmark tests that compared the performance between VMware Fusion 2.0.1 and Parallels Desktop 4.0 for Mac (build 3540), both running Mac OS X 10.5.5.

#Vmware fusion 10 system requirements software

No third party software was installed other than Mac OS X, VMware Fusion, Parallels Desktop, Windows XP, Windows Vista, Adobe Reader and Microsoft Office. All tests were done on clean host systems with new installations of Mac OS X 10.4.10 and Office installations and included all of the most up-to-date patches. MacTech tested Parallels Desktop 3.0 for Mac Build 5160 and VMware Fusion 1.0 Build 51348.

#Vmware fusion 10 system requirements pro

Shorter bars indicate faster performance.įile:Mactech-cross-platform.png File:Mactech-network-file-io.pngĮach test was run on a MacBook (2 GB RAM 1.83 GHz Core Duo processor), a MacBook Pro (4 GB RAM 2.16 GHz Core 2 Duo processor) and a Mac Pro (4 GB RAM Quad Core configuration with two 2.66 GHz Dual-Core Intel Xeon processors). The following graphs displays the results in seconds. MacTech did not test multiple processor performance. MacTech found that the faster the physical host computer, the more similarly Parallels Desktop and VMware Fusion performed.

#Vmware fusion 10 system requirements Pc

In Volume 24, Issue 02 of MacTech, the editors published the results of one-step and task tests between VMware Fusion 1.0, Parallels Desktop 3.0 and Boot Camp and used a PC running Windows XP as a baseline comparison in a native PC environment. Fusion was set to 128 MB of graphics memory, and Parallels Desktop for Mac was set to 64 MB of graphics memory (the maximum for each at that time). Fusion and Parallels were both set to 1,024 MB of system memory and a 32 GB hard disk. This comparison was tested on an eight-core, 2.66 GHz MacPro running Mac OS X 10.4.10, Parallels Desktop 3.0 for Mac (build 4560) and VMware Fusion 1.0 (build 51348). This comparison is of limited value today, as Parallels Desktop has had 4 major upgrades and VMware Fusion has had 3.įile:Fusion chart01.png File:Fusion chart02.png It should also be noted that Boot Camp is a tool for natively booting Windows XP on Intel Macintosh and is not a virtualization product. On August 16, 2007, CNET published the results of several benchmarks in which Fusion demonstrated better performance than Parallels Desktop for Mac in SMP-aware applications, which Fusion supports while Parallels does not. Mac OS X 10.6.8 or later Mac OS X 10.7.5 or later Mac OS X 10.8.4 or later Mac OS X 10.9 or later

Mac OS X 10.6.7 or later Mac OS X 10.7 recommended